A high-quality post?
Here's a tip for the copywriters: The word "quality" sucks. And it sucks big-time.
Let's start with the way the word sounds, shall we? Qua-li-ty. It's soft. All those vowels. It slides easily off the tongue, without much impact. It slips away at the end. Not like, say, "top-notch."
And quality is a word that implies its opposite. It doesn't really say anything about your product or service. Unless you are peddling something really low-end, in which case "value" is your sole selling-point, you'd better hope to hell that you have quality.
Your readers should assume that quality is what they are getting. Pointing it out to them risks making it sound like you have no other fine points to emphasize. By saying that you offer a "quality service," you are saying that you can't really think of anything else to say about it. This would probably indicate that the quality is not all that great. When I see a gift shop that offers "quality souvenirs" I assume I am in for shelves filled with cheap crap made in China.
Now, quality in some contexts is OK: "Precision-engineered Swiss quality." Here we are talking about a very specific quality -- not quality in general.
"High quality" is really no better than "quality" on its own. What, are you trying to make sure your readers don't think you're plugging low-quality items?
So use "quality" with caution, if at all. It's like "fascinating" and "unique" in that way. But those are posts for another day.
Thanks for spending some quality time with me.
Labels: Copywriting


Stumble It!